The Radio Equalizer: Brian Maloney

19 September 2006

Mike Malloy, Air America Radio Website Hacked


Uses Old Login To Slam Air America Radio

*** Updated ***

Fired talk show host Mike Malloy has apparently hacked his former employer's website, posting a note highly critical of Air America's current management regime.

Calling them "pod people", Malloy seems to have used his former login to post this verbal attack front and center at the liberal talk radio network's website, which was still there as of 11pm Monday night:

The Peter Werbe Show
Weekdays 10pm-Midnight EST

w/ host Peter Werbe

Hi. Malloy here. It’s Monday, September 18, 2006. Well, it’s been almost three weeks since we were fired by the really, really strange pod-people who have temporarily taken over Air America. Tonight’s program will be hosted by my good friend Peter Werbe. Not sure what he’s talking about tonight, but do tune in.

If you’re wondering how we’re writing and posting this mini-blog it’s simply because the airheads in Air America’s executive suites – the pod-people mentioned above – are too, um, stupid to figure out how to handle their own website access.

The door’s wide open. Well, eventually their bodies will start to react to Earth atmosphere and they’ll have to leave. Meantime, Mike and Kathy here saying, stay tuned!

He also apparently regained access to his former show page, still active within Air America's site, to post a nearly identical note.

Quickly realizing what had occurred, fans of the left- wing extremist talk host lavished praise on Malloy for his action:

That's how you do it!

Exactly like this.. right in their faces, right under their stuck up noses! We're right here Mike & Kathy and we're not going away. So wherever you land eventually, we'll be there too. Keep us posted here, or at your site.. looking forward to the
real story about your show snatching.

Btw, have you thought about releasing a CD of your reading of 1984? I was mesmerized by it... you had the perfect voice for it. And with that bell chiming periodically.. it had a real vibe.

Miss you lots and everything you brought, but I also miss Kathy's deliciously wicked sense of humor. Oh, she could come up with 'em! When Ms. Molly grows up...she's gonna be one wonderfully dangerous synthesis of the two of you! Watch her back would ya?
From Sactown...

by gg2k6 at September 18, 2006 - 11:19pm | login or register to post comments | email this comment

Hey AAR asshats

Either REALLY fire Malloy and pay his f***ing final check or announce that he is back on, but stop screwing with him.

I will NOT be listening to your network anymore if you don't get Mike back on the air ASAP!!! Viva Stephanie Miller and Peter B Collins!

by patrioticliberal at September 18, 2006 - 11:15pm | login or register to post comments | email this comment

Your Radio Equalizer wonders why Malloy and others are fighting to retain jobs on a network that lacks enough money to function.

In addition, if there was any remaining hope for Malloy to return to the network, he's now flushed it down the toilet with this foolish stunt. Not very bright, Mike.

At the same time, Malloy calls the current regime "temporary", as if he's counting on Sheldon Drobny to retake control of the network and immediately rehire him.

UPDATE: as could be expected, every last trace of Malloy was removed from the website this morning.

Thanks for your continued and vital Radio Equalizer support, via Amazon orders that begin with clicks here, regardless of what you ultimately order!

Technorati tags:

Old Picture: David A Lunde


  • Now that is more like it.

    By Blogger Elmonica, at 19 September, 2006 00:29  

  • Too funny!

    God Bless Mike Malloy.

    You know, I really LIKE that term, "pod people"!

    I think I'll start using that as well...

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 19 September, 2006 00:31  

  • A comment and a question:

    So much for honor among thieves!

    And, how on earth was Malloy able to hack into their system?

    By Blogger The Real Bob Anthony, at 19 September, 2006 07:27  

  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    By Blogger liberal outlaw, at 19 September, 2006 09:43  

  • apparently Patriot World didn't read the post. if he did, he would have seen the answer to his question

    By Blogger liberal outlaw, at 19 September, 2006 09:45  

  • How is HE a thief when AAR is withholding his severance, not issuing him a termination letter, thereby holding up his unemployment claim and starving his baby?

    Honor, eh?

    "Patriot", you wouldn't know the meaning of the word anymore then Chimpy knows the meaning of the term "human dignity"...

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 19 September, 2006 10:04  

  • "You know, I really LIKE that term, 'pod people'! I think I'll start using that as well..."

    Yeah, why think for yourself? Just go along with everybody else.

    By Blogger Jim, at 19 September, 2006 12:49  

  • good point, Jim. once someone uses a term nobody else can use it.

    By Blogger liberal outlaw, at 19 September, 2006 12:58  

  • Jim, that's too funny, coming from the neocon scum that is draining the life from this once-proud nation.

    Go hang your head in shame.

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 19 September, 2006 15:08  

  • Just march in lockstep with the rest of them, nothing wrong with that.

    By Blogger Jim, at 19 September, 2006 15:08  

  • jim, i am absolutely amazed that a conservative could even have the testicles to accuse anyone else on the planet of marching lock-step with others.

    obviously you are against the policies of your own leaders and fellow republicans or else you wouldn't be saying something like that. i'm sure that you don't believe the false claims of Iraq having WMD's. surely you couldn't be that much of a hypocrit, right?

    By Blogger liberal outlaw, at 19 September, 2006 16:11  

  • March, march, march!

    By Blogger Jim, at 19 September, 2006 16:25  

  • They write these things just to show us how pro-torture they really are!

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 19 September, 2006 18:00  

  • "This year's leap second is an assault on the American public," says commentator Bill O'Reilly. "The reason the leap second is even being proposed is because of America Haters, because of Iraqi hate mongers, and let's be honest, Shiites. Why would you add a second to the year unless you're an anti-American hate monger? I remember liberals at a party saying, 'let's add a second to the year' and I was the only one who spoke up against it. Why would they want to add a second to the year? Because it gives them a second longer to hate Bush.

    "Look, look, look, look. A leap second is a denial of everything American, of everything good, of everything moral. They're saying we need this second because the earth rotates on its axis and revolves around the earth, well this is the no spin zone. So we don't need a leap second. Though I would rather have a leap second than some of these hate-mongers who go around hating even their own ideas! They need to hate their own ideas so much that you have many liberals proposing the leap second, which is an idea that they hate, yet, they propose.

    "I am so so so so upset with these people, who actually believe their ideas, yet, I have no hate in my heart. I am a simple guy, who only has my own true beliefs and a few products that are my cornerstone to fight against the leap second poobah. Let me say it aloud: Leap Second, leap second, leap second. Doesn't it sound ugly?

    "Please, don't let these Darwinian leap-seconders, who believe that the planets revolve around the sun, who believe that rocks are sedimentary, igneous and stalactites, who are innocent dim-wit believers in a faith bordering on hating everything religious like trees and fruitcake, yet, who don't believe in John 7:12:45:67:89, have their say.

    "But you know what I love? Dialogue. Rational dialogue which allows me to say that aliens from a Iraqi loving planet want to abolish Christmas by adding a leap second to the Darwinian anti-God year. Dialogue is what keeps the American system God-loving and anti non-God. It also keeps the anti-God loving non-Iraqi loving insurgent deniers able to voice their hideous so-called opinions over the American loving tolerant airways. And now let's take some calls."
    -- Steve Martin

    Keep it spinning Freepers, we enjoy marveling at the way of the Freep.

    By Blogger WHT, at 19 September, 2006 21:36  

  • Very funny WHT.

    The first time I saw Steve Martin was when I was in college in the early 70's. He was wearing a rubber penis on his nose. Seriously. I've never thought much of his humor since, but I suppose you could relate.

    Nice on-topic post too - not.

    Medication shorten your attention span, or is it genetic?

    By Blogger Lokki, at 19 September, 2006 22:47  

  • I guess this is all part of the torture you've promised us.

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 20 September, 2006 00:35  

  • How exactly does any liberal claim, with a straight face, that all conservatives think alike?

    Did you miss the way the Donkey Party dropped Joe Lieberman like a bag of fresh spinach the minute they discovered he wouldn't be their ventriloquist's dummy on the war in Iraq? Woe be to any Democratic politician who dares to think for himself.

    By Blogger The4thEstate, at 20 September, 2006 15:27  

  • Joe Lieberman hasn't had an intelligent thought of his own in years. In fact, as I've mentioned before, an intelligent thought in his mind would soon have to evacuate the neighborhood, or it would die of its own common loneliness.

    Lieberman has ONE thing on his mind.

    And it ain't America, trust me.

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 20 September, 2006 19:38  

  • Hup, two, three, four!

    By Blogger Jim, at 20 September, 2006 21:07  

  • Lokki


    By Blogger WHT, at 20 September, 2006 22:04  

  • "Joe Lieberman hasn't had an intelligent thought of his own in years. In fact, as I've mentioned before, an intelligent thought in his mind would soon have to evacuate the neighborhood, or it would die of its own common loneliness.

    Lieberman has ONE thing on his mind.

    And it ain't America, trust me."

    Quick question, hash: Did you have that opinion about Joe Lieberman back in 2000? And if that is the case, did you support and/or vote for the SoreLoserman ticket anyway?

    Or are you just pissed off at him now because he actually dared to act outside of Donk Orthodoxy on the GWOT?

    I know it's tough for the average ProgTard to understand, hash, but you can't have it both ways on this.

    By Blogger JD, at 20 September, 2006 22:43  

  • Anyone tying the GWOT to Iraq doesn't deserve reelection, just disdain.

    By Blogger Elmonica, at 20 September, 2006 23:56  

  • Look over there! Isn't that Bill Clinton's penis?

    By Blogger Zelph, at 21 September, 2006 01:39  

  • No, she just spilled some mayonnaise on her blouse. Move along.

    By Blogger Jim, at 21 September, 2006 03:09  

  • We wouldn't want you faggots to interrupt you and Guckert doing for George and Karl what Monica did for Bill....

    And, JD, I absolutely stood in opposition to Lieberman from the get-go. I knew what his true motivations were, but, remember, such things are only beginning to be openly discussed....

    Lieberman was always a parasite.

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 21 September, 2006 12:23  

  • elmonica said ...
    Anyone tying the GWOT to Iraq doesn't deserve reelection, just disdain.

    Thank you for proving my point.

    In other words, that's what Lieberman gets for daring to have an opinion of his own. Kind of a modern-day equivalent of the way Galileo was treated by the Roman Catholic Church for spouting all that heresy.

    So much for the "party of diversity."

    By Blogger The4thEstate, at 21 September, 2006 12:39  

  • Cut the crap.

    There are Democratic senators who authorized force who are going to retain their seats including Maria Cantwell of Washington.

    There are plenty of 1 issue morons on the right who will vote Republican based solely on the issue of abortion or other faith- based nonsense.

    War is as important an issue as exists in the public arena and for a voter to decide that he can't support his candidate anymore because of his stance on that issue is quite reasonable.

    By Blogger Elmonica, at 21 September, 2006 18:27  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Page Rank Checker

Powered by Blogger