The Radio Equalizer: Brian Maloney

24 April 2007

Media Matters, Melanie Morgan, Bill O'Reilly, George Soros


Who Will Take On Soros-Funded Smear Machine?

In the escalating ideological war for Internet dominance, do conservatives stand a chance?

The problem is mainly one of resources: with millions of dollars supporting a network of "progressive" smear sites, versus an unfunded, loose- knit collection of grass roots- based conservative blogs, it's amazing the race is even this close.

On the left, that mega- money is building a force of "progressive" cyberthugs, bent on bullying Internet conservatives and wiping out right- leaning talk radio. By now, you know the names: Media Matters, the Huffington Post, DailyKos and others.

Learning from past mistakes, billionaire leftist George Soros and his friends have shifted their resources away from Air America Radio's money pit and into websites like those mentioned above. Apparently, it's easier to tear down enemies through the web than to sell one's ideas via talk radio.

While "progressive" activists receive full- time salaries to monitor and report on conservative talk radio and blogs, on the other side, most are essentially volunteers. On the right, there are no counterparts to Soros, Peter Lewis and the Democracy Alliance backers.

On the O'Reilly Factor this week, Bill has been connecting the dots between Soros, his fellow- travellers and the organizations they have founded in order to conduct ideological warfare. Michelle Malkin, never one to fear the battle, has been working with him on key background research.

In addition, your Radio Equalizer has done previous research into these fat cat donors. Here's a good starting point.

The impact is clear: conservatives are at a 'net disadvantage when it comes to search engine results, fighting back when firestorms are generated against talk show hosts and bringing forward an issues- based agenda. It can even hurt fundraising efforts for GOP candidates.

Money isn't the only issue: by our very nature, we tend to be individualistic, while "progressives" usually take a group approach. Usually, that's not a problem for the right.

Here, however, conservatives sometimes don't provide enough support for one another. When the smear sites have selected their latest conservative target, that can be damaging, as the person is left to fight them nearly alone. With that kind of environment, who stands a chance?

In addition, there's another key difference: while lefty sites overwhelmingly support the Democrats, their counterparts on the right want little to do with the GOP these days.

While your Radio Equalizer strongly advocated for the removal of Don Imus long before nearly anyone else on the Internet, the manner in which he was whacked was disturbing. Though clearly a leftist, this site believes he was targeted by these sites anyway, as a trial run for going after the big guns: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and others.

For the right, the situation is alarming, according to The Examiner's Robert Cox:

Web 2.0 worse for the right than it thinks

Robert Cox, The Examiner
Apr 24, 2007 10:48 AM

WASHINGTON - For several years now, a common refrain among left-wing online political activists has been “We need to own the Internet the way the right owns talk radio.” Based on recent filings with the Federal Election Commission, it looks like the left has succeeded — with Democratic presidential candidates as the primary beneficiaries.

Last fall in this space, I asked, “When will the right recognize the cost of conceding Web 2.0?” With that cost now readily apparent in the form of online campaign contributions for the 2008 presidential campaign cycle, the only remaining question is whether conservatives can do anything about it in time for the elections next fall. It appears likely the answer will be a resounding no.

In the first quarter of this year, Democratic candidates raised almost $80 million, far ahead of the Republican candidates, who combined raised just over $50 million. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., raised $6.9 million over the Internet from 50,000 individuals, most of whom gave in small amounts. That means they can be tapped again during the campaign. More than 8,000 individuals signed up as volunteers through the Obama Web site.

Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., raised $4.2 million over the Internet. The Republican candidates did not break out online contributions separately but all of this suggests the gap will only grow wider over the course of the 2008 election cycle.

Joe Trippi, who has since signed on to work for former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards’ presidential campaign said, “We built it and they didn’t. Now it’s paying big dividends.”

The first step in recovery for the right is to admit they have a problem. But admitting you have a problem requires you come to terms with just how bad a problem you really have. When conservatives get around to taking a hard look, they are not going to like what they see. The left has constructed a complex web of intersecting points of information and propaganda, which the right may never fully undo.

To better appreciate the dilemma now facing the right in a Web 2.0 world, it may be instructive to look at one example of how the right is losing in the online arms race — the nexus between Google, Wikipedia and far-left blogs and online forums.

Because it reveals real financial damage to the GOP's presidential contenders due to this Internet disadvantage, Cox's piece is particularly on the mark.

But what about the impact of lefty smear pieces on conservative commentators? When the words of talk hosts and television pundits are twisted and distorted, who is there to fight back?

It's no secret that their next target is Rush Limbaugh. When a coordinated attack is mounted against him, will conservatives be ready for the mainstream media's onslaught?

One host who is not taking their bullying lying down is KSFO / San Francisco host Melanie Morgan. A frequent target of Media Matters (there's a whole section on their site devoted to her), Morgan earlier this week had this to say about them:

When the Los Angeles Times noted that the loss of Imus' radio program (and accompanying MSNBC simulcast) would hurt liberal causes and Democrat candidates for office, Media Matters launched an attack on the Times story because it showcased the non-conservative leanings of Imus.

This is standard practice for Media Matters and its incessant war against conservatism and the movement's most prominent media figures.

The list of conservative figures targeted by Media Matters is endless: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Glenn Beck, Fred Barnes, Michelle Malkin, Oliver North, Ann Coulter, Debbie Schlussel and many others.

Media Matters was founded with the support and funding from key Democrat operatives, including John Podesta, former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton. The group has documented ties to far-left organizations such as and the Center for American Progress – both of which have been funded by far-left billionaire George Soros.

I have lived on the other side of the gun barrel pointed by Media Matters for America for the better part of three years, and I know what it feels like when a bunch of crackpots with keyboards pull the trigger, backed by millions upon millions of dollars in funding from George Soros.

I co-host "The Lee Rodgers & Melanie Morgan Show," a conservative news/talk program on KSFO 560 AM in San Francisco, every weekday morning for four hours. Liberals are disgusted that our conservative program is one of the most-listened to radio programs in the notoriously liberal San Francisco Bay Area. We've endured several vicious campaigns waged against us by liberal activists with the backing of Media Matters for America, as they worked ruthlessly to have us silenced.

Several times these left-wing free speech Nazi's have almost succeeded.

The transcripts and audio files of my comments have been excerpted, misrepresented and reconfigured to take statements out of context, reprinted with lies and distortions, and then disseminated to other liberal media outlets with fierce resolve.

The Democratic Party wants to silence us, and they use Media Matters for America to wage a war against us replete with character assassination, personal threats, lawsuits and efforts to have us fired or suspended.

I can live with being targeted by these "vile, despicable ankle-biters," as Bill O'Reilly calls Media Matters. In an odd way, the attacks against me have energized me to fight even harder for the conservative causes I believe in. One of those causes includes the right to bear arms, a right that had been denied to the students and professors at Virginia Tech University who were unable to defend themselves from a deranged murderer who took no notice of the school's status as a "Gun Free Zone."

Here's their response, complete with a claim that Soros money doesn't fund their operation (perhaps not directly!):

KSFO's Morgan: Media Matters like Virginia Tech gunman

In an April 20 column for, Melanie Morgan, co-host of San Francisco radio station KSFO's Lee Rodgers & Melanie Morgan Program, compared Media Matters for America to the Virginia Tech gunman who killed 32 people before shooting himself to death. Morgan wrote: "Like that mentally unbalanced and angry gunman at Virginia Tech, they'll methodically march through the domiciles of the conservative movement, targeting the movement's leaders for career elimination -- until and unless we stand up and fight back against their campaign of mayhem against conservative leaders and causes." Morgan also attacked Media Matters as "left-wing free speech Nazis."

Morgan wrote: "I have lived on the other side of the gun barrel pointed by Media Matters for America for the better part of three years, and I know what it feels like when a bunch of crackpots with keyboards pull the trigger, backed by millions upon millions of dollars in funding from George Soros." She added: "The transcripts and audio files of my comments have been excerpted, misrepresented and reconfigured to take statements out of context, reprinted with lies and distortions, and then disseminated to other liberal media outlets with fierce resolve." Morgan offered no evidence to support these accusations. Moreover, Media Matters has never received money from progressive philanthropist George Soros.

Morgan has smeared Soros in the past, agreeing with co-host Lee Rodgers' assertion that Soros "apparently very cheerfully and willingly went to work for the Nazis" as a young boy, and adding that Soros did so to "further his own career." KSFO's program director announced in a subsequent show that Rodgers' and Morgan's comments about Soros "are not accurate, and KSFO regrets that they were broadcast." Morgan also has announced that "[w]e've got a bull's-eye painted on [House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's] big, wide laughing eyes."

From this point forward, it's going to take a team approach, as well as fresh ideas about funding and financial viability in order to have any chance at countering this very real threat. Let's not wait until they succeed in yanking Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly off the air, or wiping out prominent conservative bloggers.

Is the right paying attention? Failure to grasp the severity of the situation could be deadly.

Following this post, your Radio Equalizer will be spelling out just where this site stands in the scheme of things. While some will find it self- serving, it should make more sense to others who have followed this work from the beginning.

Will you support the Radio Equalizer?

Your Amazon orders that begin with clicks here, regardless of what you ultimately purchase, greatly assist this site's efforts.

Or, please consider making a contribution at the Honor System box. Thanks again!

Technorati tags:

Some images: AP


  • fucking pathetic

    Soros does not fucking fund Media Matters, you piece of shit

    conservatives are now the joke of America, pathological liars
    Soros has nothing to do with media matters

    Media matters =David Brock
    a former right winger, who got sick of being a filthy hack

    and if your side was not so insane, and did not lie on national TV and radio, there would be no media matters

    I for one, just donatd $500

    Why is there a wear on conservatism?

    you filthy pedo-cons started the war

    liberals fight back too

    you started
    we finish

    you mentally disturbed little freaks

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 24 April, 2007 14:38  

  • Fair and balanced?
    Despite numerous requests to appear on The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly still has not extended an invitation to Media Matters President and CEO David Brock to discuss his accusations and ad hominem attacks, nor has O'Reilly offered any evidence for his claims that Media Matters has "distorted comments" made by him or any other media figure.

    By Blogger Justin, at 24 April, 2007 16:05  

  • I figured MoPoop and others slimers of the left would try to deny that Soros' money is funneled through organizations like Even Media Matters stopped saying that Soros' money was not coming through those groups.

    The more the left speaks, the more they lie.

    By Blogger PCD, at 24 April, 2007 16:35  

  • PCD

    Have you not figured a fuckling thing out yet?

    your time is over

    the neo-con movement is DEAD
    conservatism is DEAD


    and all media matters does is recite exactly what your disgusting Anti-American people pro-business only side says. If your side was not so degenerate, depraved and vile, there would be no media matters.

    and soros has nothing to do with it freak

    When I get my tax refund, in spite of you 20%ers, they will get my refund check






    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 24 April, 2007 16:54  

  • Brock is a head case, just like you MoPoop.

    Read it and weep for your puppet leader.

    By Blogger PCD, at 24 April, 2007 16:57  

  • spare me the pedo-con links. Drudge defended your hero Mark Foley, as far as I'm concerned he is a pedo-con.

    Brock was a former right wing hack, who got tired of being abused by a degenerate ideology of murder, lies and failure

    Brock is an American hero as far as Im concerned

    Cons hate MM because MM breaks the "lib media" myth. If the media is liberal, where is the conservative MM, pointing out "liberal media" bias???

    Pedo-cons are the lowest of the low
    drudge is another pedo-con. Rove another pedo-con hanging with 17 year old boys, sick, warped, twisted and degenerate

    I wish a rain would come and wipe all the neo-con scum away !

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 24 April, 2007 17:24  

  • From the Right Wing Dictionary:

    Smear: To record the exact words of a Right Wing Mouthpiece (O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc) via a recording device, and then allow that to be heard by others via the internet.


    By Blogger RobertSeattle, at 24 April, 2007 17:30  

  • Dear PCD:

    My understanding is that Drudge mostly hates Brock because the latter rejected the formers come-on. But really, do you think Drudge is a good source of facts?

    By Blogger John, at 24 April, 2007 18:37  

  • What got me most about O'Reilly's rant on Soros (which comes perilously close at times to Nazi rants against rootless cosmopolitan [er, "Jewish," for those of you who don't know the code] bankers) is the creepy chart.

    Am I crazy or does it resemble one of those charts I saw in high school of female reproductive organs? The blood-red color gets to me too, along with those crude little arrows. I almost expect to see a little ovum come tumbling down the fallopian tubes at any moment.

    I know this sounds crazy, but I've spent a lot of time among graphic artists, and that's just the sort of thing good ones do--they play on deeply engrained imagery to cause subtle emotional effects.

    By Blogger John, at 24 April, 2007 18:45  

  • "On the right, there are no counterparts to Soros, Peter Lewis and the Democracy Alliance backers."

    Your either horribly uninformed or intentionally misleading your audience.

    Ever heard of Richard Mellon Scaife? Reverend Moon?

    By Blogger Unknown, at 24 April, 2007 18:45  

  • Scaife money ran out years ago. Also, the Washington Times has been hurting for a long time. Moon is not a general supporter of right- wing causes. Not good examples.

    By Blogger Brian Maloney, at 24 April, 2007 20:02  

  • "Scaife money ran out years ago..."

    yes, brian, that's very believable

    "Moon is not a general supporter of right- wing causes..."

    yes, brian, he's a regular observer at code pink demonstrations

    and it is david brock, not laura ingraham, who is welcomed into policy discussions at the neocon white house

    it's interesting to note that the right-wing hate machine needs to fabricate an endless number of smears, slanders, and outright fables in order to persecute the left, whereas all an organization like mmfa needs to do is simply present the facts clearly, as they happen, and the right-wing pantywaists have a collective hissy fit that their lies, transgressions, and, yes, a level of drug-infused pedophiliac manic debauchery incomparable to anything ever witnessed will be exposed

    america is now a circus, thanks to the machinations of the evilians on the rabid, parasitic right

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 24 April, 2007 22:42  

    SiteMeter: 15 hits per day average
    Technorati: "unknown"
    Alexa: "Who?"

    Woo! You're kicking ass, skippy! Remind me of that time you sent traffic my way, because your such a broadband badass.

    You remember, right? When you bragged out your ass about your traffic-fu, and stole my graph to make you look cool?


    By Blogger Unknown, at 25 April, 2007 06:22  

  • Face it, except for these here comment riffs and your dicey friends, your one step below Cho.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 25 April, 2007 06:39  

  • I see no need to put progressive in quotes, everyone acknowledges these sites have a liberal/ progressive viewpoint. The term that should be in quotation marks is "smear", because only those that dislike what is published believe they are being smeared. The rest of us believe the sites just focus a little more light on some of the crap that the right wing media spews on a daily basis.

    By Blogger Ezsuds, at 25 April, 2007 06:53  

  • TC

    Go Chaney yourself. Our podcasts are doing well, over 500 downloads a week, and you?

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 09:16  

  • MoPoop needs to be fitted with a straight jacket ASAP. The boy is ill.

    As for the rest of the Lefties, not one of you did anything to refute Drudge or O'Reilly. All you did was go off on your canned rants and expressions of BDS.

    Metro, for the most part Drudge is a news digest. He highlights articles from publications like the NYTimes. People like you do smear, not showing truth, but trying to hoodwink the public once again.

    If you lefties are so danmed confident that America moved Left, then campaign truthfully. Stop your lying about what you want and what you'll do with power.

    By Blogger PCD, at 25 April, 2007 09:17  

  • Wow, 500 hundred downloads... you got me, brother.

    I only sell three grand's worth of original content per week; and consult for probably half that per month just to talk idiot companies up.

    I SO wish I had to get my act together like you, dude!

    Really, I lose more than you make in a month chasing bar bets when I'm drunk on a Friday night. Fer chrissakes, Maloney's website is your advertising base!

    We ain't playing the same game, skippy.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 25 April, 2007 09:33  

  • PCD
    Whos talking about career , you talked about my blog, you love to brag about your job, which indicates tyo me, you really don't have one. Those who brag are usually LIARS.

    PCD: Me Ill? I simply speak the truth. Your a usefull idiot, America rejected the right, your all alone with a few scattered 29%ers. your the outcast, moonbat, chasing the imaginary "liberal media". Smear? Only smear is comming from your functionally retarded side. Harry Reid smear, Soros lies, Pelosi smear, Al Franken smear, your pathetic, your side isa joke in America in 2007, totally irrelevant, your side was so drunk with power, you never say November comming, and 2008 will be twice as painful. Keep it up.

    Campaign truthfully? Excuse me 28%er, I think you should demand that of the GOP, America is sick of their lies, not ours, there are no lies. Soros does not fund media matters, O'riley is a HACK, only a fool trusts that phone sex molester

    Liberals smear PCD? Everything the left has said since 1999 has come true about your filthy, degeneratre administration. in the warped, barely functional brain of an AM talk radio loving usefull idiot,FACTS are smear, and a filthy freak like Oriley is more credible. And you wonder why you were removed from power in November. Nect November you will be scratching your head again wondering: why did America reject the right winf again?

    You are a useful idiot, like a Good German in 1937. You are pathetic, you don't even deserve America, you take party over country. You love Republicans more than America, the left takes America first. Again this is why Americans have left the right in droves, by the millions. This is why only 37% of America considers themselves Republicans, Republicans represent NOTHING, they have no ideas, no plans, only smear and lies. Republican leadership in the minority has been pathetic, it is all about attacking Reid, Pelosi, clinton, no ideas, just smear.

    Absolutly pathetic

    PCDS is like a stand up act. He accuses the left of smear, meanwhile this dickless wonder is shrieking about a non-existant Soros- Media Matters connection. What a desperate loser.

    The right hates Media Matters, the answer is simple, they expose the reich wing for all of America to see. See PCD, 99% of America ignores the reich wing media. with MM out there, everybody can read exactly what kind of filth, lies and distortions, useful idiots like you base their political ideology on.

    the right trains their followers well. They simply use the "liberal media" myth to string them along. This is why I call them usefull idiots. Their masters on the AM radio decry "liberal media" and as the news unfolds the 29%ers deny reality, because reality has a "liberal" bias.
    You are really pathetic PCD, nobody is as pathetic as you. Your a fucking sheep, following your masters on the Main stream media, Oriley says "lib media" you nod your head liek a member of Hitler youth. Your a mindless idiot.
    They got you trained well, lib media, lib media. Lib media is just an excuse to deny reality.

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 10:03  

  • C'mon, admit it MoPee...

    that last harangue aimed at PCD gave you a chubby, didn't it?

    Caused a soft, wet splurt 'twixt yer skinny shanks while you were in the process of typing it, right?

    Christ, you're such a stereotype.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 25 April, 2007 10:32  

  • MoPoop and your other leftie tools, here's another post that has the goods on Soros' attempt to buy the US Presidency. Bill Moyers funneled $500K of Soros' money from the Left advocacy organization Moyers is president of to Media Matters.

    Oh, MoPoop. Your rant is noted, but it is devoid of any real dontent.

    By Blogger PCD, at 25 April, 2007 10:54  

  • T.C

    You are one strange individual,
    I get boners from my acriminious rantings? I must admit I got a laugh out of that one.

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 10:55  

  • Moyers is not president of Media matters. Look I know Eric Alterman who is the webmaster I believe of Media Matters, and also college professor, David Brock is the president of media matters. Moyers? He was from PBS. He was the one targeted for reporting by the GOP in 2002. Hes back on PBS and has a movie comming out, exposing conservative pressure on CNN, in 2001-2003. If you openm your mind watch the Moyers movie, you might learn something.

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 11:00  

  • MoPoop,

    You IGNORAMUS! I did not say Moyers was President of MM. You are a desperate person. You just confirmed your reading comprehension is nil. Read the post. Moyers is a left wingnut liar, just like you, but he has something you don't. An audience.

    By Blogger PCD, at 25 April, 2007 11:15  

  • PCd, it was your poor writing which was confusing. Moyers is not a LIAR
    You want liars
    I have a few
    O'riley, Limbaugh, Hume, all on FOX news.

    Moyers does something you dont understand

    not Bush licking

    why do you hate real reporting?

    ohhhh we know why, as 80% of America understands .. in the warped mind of a Bush sheep, reality is "liberalism"

    Moyers would make you cry, he breaks the liberal media myth, by showing how CNN caved in to the government who werte cting like the Nazi party after 9-11 trying to control the media. Lib media myth shattered by Moyers. America trust Moyers and ignores the falaffel molester O'riley. You have no credibility, your a usefull idiot reciting the same mantra, like a Hitler youth member in 1937, lib lib lib , nobody buys it anymore.
    America wants journalism, not GOP approved spin, you want a fantasy, 80% of this country demands real news.
    80% of this country is no longer under the spell cast by this sick administration. Only you cower in fear at real news.

    Your writing sucks after 4 times I figured out what your babbling about.

    Journalism in a con sheeps mind should be reporting what Rove wants or it's lib lib lib.

    for 30 years, you losers have been shrieking the same lie, nobody cares anymore, your side has become irrelevant. America is not Nazi germany, we don't need propaganda, we don't want government talking points on our news, we dont need Bush and the GOP to 'protect us" and to protect the "homeland". America does not think like hitler youth members, you do. You need to follow the leader, we demand accountability, we are Americans, your a little freak craving a unitary leadercontrolling the news, controlling our minds. The Nazi mentality of leader worship is OVER

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 11:26  

  • Judging by the similarity of the posts, alot of the left wing commentators ont his site also post of other right wing site using different names. Basedon this and other information, I'm convinced that many of those posting on the left on this site are actually doing this full time, as part of an overall strategy. I can just see these people sitting in an office somewhere, paid by MOVEON or some similar organization, monitoring right wing blogs, and making sure that anything that gets said on the right gets shouted down. Real believers in democracy and the exchange of free ideas! But, it's a living right?

    By Blogger NOBCAESAR, at 25 April, 2007 12:22  

  • nob

    no freak
    We post because we love America, and your filthy, degenerate side hates America, you take bush over america. I do this for free. I hate YOU, I HATE THE RIGHT, I HATE WHAT YOU HAVE DONE TO AMERICA


    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 13:09  

  • nob

    you dont support Democracy, your a right winger, you are an ENEMY of American Democracy, you are a CON, you are a FASCIST, not only do you deserve abuse on a message board, quite frankly you deserve to be DEPORTED, your ideology is anti Democratic.

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 13:22  

  • MoPoop,

    Use a towel when you post. We are tired of wiping off the spittle and orther material from your foaming that the mouth and acting out insanely when you post.

    You tool and fool. Others are getting paid by Soros to do what you are doing. Come back when you can think and debate rationally.

    By Blogger PCD, at 25 April, 2007 14:42  

  • Well, there's no denial of what I was saying. Sounds like good gig, though.

    By the way, your mama - or grandma - know you use that language? She needs to wash your mouth out with soap - obviously didn't do it enough when you were younger.

    Of course, any asshole with a computer can write that shit. Naturally, you wouldn't say it to anyones face.

    By Blogger nbcaesar, at 25 April, 2007 15:07  

  • The whole country despises your failed ideology, your draining the bathtub bullshit failed America. conservatism failed America.

    you can not even safely purchase food anymore thanks to conservative, let business regulate themselves ideology.
    It failed America

    The obly ones getting paid to speak politics is your heros, the radi o freaks, supporting an Anti-American ideology.
    It failed America

    draining the bathtub failed, drowning the baby in the bathtub failed, starving the government failed, go ask New Orleans

    your ideology failed, You do not know how to debate without fantasy. Soros Soros Soros, shut the fuck up.
    At 29-30% America is not getting paid to attack the right

    The nation hates your failed ideology
    We are going back to The America pre-ronald Reagan, your ideology failed, back to American valuers, liberal values, a regulated capitalism, traditional america.
    no more big business over American citizens, you failed, you offer nothing,
    soros soros soros

    Every day, I make the right cry, I do it for free, because I hate what the modern CON has done to America

    Rice under oath!!!!!!!
    Goodling under oath!!!!!!

    How much more before the 29%ers too wake up?

    Hey PCD
    Hannity is on, take notes!!

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 15:11  

  • nd

    I say it to your face
    I knock you and your America hating 29%ers in your place
    Back off neo-cons understand

    America is taking their country back, from your failed ideology.
    I do it for free,
    I hate your failed ideology

    I prove how it failed America every day
    i broadcast it for free too

    Back to tradsitional american values
    Liberal American values

    your time is up

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 15:13  

  • wrong, wrong wrong - don't bullshit - you and the rest are being paid to write these posts, and to leave messages on blogs to create the illusion of a grass route support. I've seen the posts on other sites, too, and spoke to a friend about it. What I haven't been able to figure out is how many "different" people posting are actually the same person.

    It does sound like a decent gig, though - what do you make?

    By Blogger nbcaesar, at 25 April, 2007 15:19  

  • at 29% nobody needs to get paid

    you are hated by your whole nation

    Bush sheep

    do you want to try me

    meet me face to face bitch con turd
    I wll spit it in your face
    for free

    at 29%
    you have been rejected by America

    see you in 2008

    america hates CONS

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 15:27  

  • In november of 2006 we were all paid
    to remove Republicans from office too, right??

    Americas has spoken, you are living in a parallel universe.

    Neo-cons are depised all over America, except on AM talk radio

    got it Nazi?

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 25 April, 2007 15:31  

  • Yeah, but I'm right, and you haven't denied it - I've seen the posts on other sites with different screen names - exact same style, and same manner of responding to posts. How many different people do you post as on this site? It's a fucking scam -You obviously are monitoring all these blogs, and making sure that you do an immediate response. I am so right about this - where do you work, and who are you working for? Christ, you probably don't even believe in what you are saying ---it's a fucking JOB!

    By Blogger katrinalover, at 25 April, 2007 16:47  

  • " and the rest are being paid to write these posts, and to leave messages on blogs to create the illusion of a grass route support..."

    is the concept of truth
    so totally alien to you
    that you can no longer fathom
    the idea of anyone commenting
    on a blog without being paid

    if this doesn't perfectly illustrate the failed ideology
    of conservatism, nothing will

    it's not just that you
    cannot handle the truth
    you see no worth in it
    right out of the gate

    americans want answers

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 25 April, 2007 17:35  

  • Nonsense - I've seen the same bullshit poetry on other sites, with a different name, too. Hell, I tried different names just now and it's easy. You're all sitting in some office somewhere going through a list of blogs and making sure you get all the responses in. It's a fucking game. You were so bored with doing it you decided to practice your lousy poetry (I don't blame you - I'd be bored too). You are probably the same guy (or woman, who knows?) who posts under a bunch of names. It's not that hard to see the similarites. And there ain't no doubt that its the same person posting under different names on other sites - there's no way that can't be true. And besides, no one would have the time to do that without being paid for it. Plus I spoke to someone who has a friend that works for one of the organizations - both sides do it, as a way to show public support. I would say what a bunch of losers but if you're being paid for it well, who cares?

    By Blogger katrinalover, at 25 April, 2007 18:01  

  • Plus you're trading off too. One time under one name, and another time under another name. In a sense why do I give a shit - it's all a fucking game anyway - no one's mind is going to be changed by seeing a bunch of assholes posting on a fucking blog!

    By Blogger katrinalover, at 25 April, 2007 18:05  

  • wow, with your deductive reasoning
    you should consider the nypd


    one thing i think we, or i guess, me
    in any of my alleged incarnations is
    it's pretty friggin' funny watching
    a bunch of morons slamming soros
    in defense of hootchie-cootchie melon-baller morgan

    if only that it were
    that i would come here for commerce
    and not just for entertainment

    america, what a country

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 25 April, 2007 18:35  

  • See Hash
    In their reality, their failed ideology is loved around the country, pay no attention to anything, poll numbers, November of last year. There is no way more than one individual despises the right, despises their failed ideology and despises right wing radio. The 70-80% of America that reject neo-conservatism, paleo-conservatism and trickle down are simply just one or two people and we are all paid!!!!!

    They are gone, it's like conservatives are on LSD. They are in another universe. One where the attorney General is doing a fine job, one where the administration has been nothing but honest with the American people, one where multiple suponeas against Condi Rice, The RNC, Monica Goodling, Karl Rove's aide, none of this is happening. Pat Tillman, those hearings are liberal hate hearings, etc. etc. etc.

    I like to say cons are drunk with power a lot, I think it's past that, cons are high on LSD.

    In their world, you, I and the millions of Americans who reject the lies, deception, supression of votes, occupations for oil contracts, use of media for government propaganda, destruction of the Middle Class, destructon of the enviornment, elimination of unions, and their blatent attempt to privitize the entire country.... you and I are just paid to say this. I wish I was getting paid to say it, but our patriotism comes before being paid. Con enablers, as in people like Maloney,PCD, the right wing radio hosts are a huge part of the problem, their loyalty to this failed ideology enables this failed "conservative" ideology and economic system, to forge ahead. This is wy I do it. To shame you bastards, who are wilfully ignorant and take party over country.

    Do I get carried away? yes I do, you filthy little pedo-con bastard freaks deserve it

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 26 April, 2007 09:33  

  • This is the absolute insanity!

    Foul language followed by "God Bless Media Matters". "God Bless" followed by all of the "Hate" this, "Hate" that, "Hate" you.

    And then this statement of "The nation hates your failed ideology. We are going back to The America pre-ronald Reagan, your ideology failed, back to American valuers, liberal values, a regulated capitalism, traditional america. no more big business over American citizens, you failed, you offer nothing,
    soros soros soros"--

    Traditional America had nothing to do with the "liberal values" that we know today (but then again what does anyone stand for exactly) had to do with Christianity values. You know, "In god we trust". God has not failed, we have failed him!

    We are all so wrapped up in "me, me, me", "I want, I want/I don't wanna..", "I am uncomfortable with.../It is easier to.." that we fail to take the time to see what is actually in the best interest of our country and ultimately the best interest for us.

    As for Big business"...I don't think anyone can disagree with "no more big business over American citizens...except the ones padding their pockets.)

    I believe that both sides (left & right) have become so determined to destroy each other that hate, destruction, and Narcissism seems that is the only messages that are coming across loud and clear.

    It is healthy and right to counter each others ideas & thoughts, but when the loudest of opinions expressed are of nothing but hate for the "other side" no matter the leads many questioning, what exactly it is that you (to everyone)stand for...HATE? Want to make a difference? Make a change.

    By Blogger Christie, at 26 April, 2007 10:57  

  • Hash, would you like to be banished to Jordan? Maybe you like a monarchy better than a representative republic?

    By Blogger PCD, at 26 April, 2007 14:32  

  • Christie

    you have no concept of what Liberal values are

    Im talking the 50's and the 60's

    When America valued unions, the New Deal, the liberlism that built the America we know so well.
    you know the America that values people over big business

    your right
    Those are the liberal values no longer existant in America today, today is laizze faire conservatism, where workers are shit on, where unions are dismantled and free market destroys the American family.

    Don't ever call my writings insanity, you clearly havce no grasp on history nor American politics. Our society abandoned those liberal values for conservative free market morals.
    business over people
    profits over people
    drain the government
    strangle the government
    use it only to monitor the citizens and do wage war

    There are no more liberal American values... conservatives destroyed the fabric of America.

    Hate? yes i hate the ideology that is killing my country. Get it? I hate conservatism, it is a failed ideology, if right wing hostsd can hate traditional American Liberal values, hate the ideology that built America, I can hate the ideology that is destroying America

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 26 April, 2007 15:18  

  • "Hash, would you like to be banished to Jordan? Maybe you like a monarchy better than a representative republic?"

    why don't you tell US, fudgie
    since you and yours have turned
    OUR america into a virtual fiefdom

    and before i go ANYWHERE
    you'll pay back what you've stolen
    and you will pay me reparations
    so i may rebuild elsewhere

    oh, you will pay handsomely
    to realize your dream
    of a neocon america

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 26 April, 2007 20:31  

  • Ah, poetry:

    There once was a man named Maloney
    Who squandered his patrimony.
    His backers fled;
    His accounts turned red;
    You can't make cash from baloney.

    By Blogger John, at 27 April, 2007 00:28  

  • M.O.P.,
    You are right in saying that I don't have a firm understanding of history or American politics. I am now in the process of learning, cause honestly I questioned neither, in school (I held on to the information long enough to pass the test).

    I actually came here to find out what liberalism is about...which you have been good enough to inform me of some beliefs in your post to me. All I knew of "liberalism" is what is published by the "news", talk radio, or the simplist dictionary. (Which there is just as much agenda driven propaganda Knowing this you must understand how the first things I found on this blog were disturbing. As someone whom was looking in...the first taste of liberalism seemed to fit the mold of that of which conservatives speak of.

    I may not be a buff on the H & P issues. What I am is a naive, simple, small backboned, female whom just wants to understand (and is trying to build a backbone in learning exactly what it is that I believe). I do have certain core values/morals but I don't strive to change anyones views, I don't believe in "World Peace", I am not a believer in an utopia society (don't think it would be good, nor possible)...I just want to learn what each side is fighting for and which side of the fence I am on.

    My simplistic version of what I see, is that basically both liberals and conservatives want the same thing...A better life for themselves, their kids, grandkids & future generations. It seems that the biggest difference in L's & C's is the steps that each feel are required to accomplish this goal.

    Though this observation is put extremely simply, is this correct? (Just looking for a place to start)

    P.S. I commend you for feeling such strong convictions in your beliefs, as do alot of people. As I was stating earlier it just seems like the message from both sides seems to gets lost in the bickering and name calling. Thanks, for not getting into all of that in your post to me.

    By Blogger Christie, at 27 April, 2007 04:05  

  • thank YOU, christie
    for contributing to the dialogue
    in a civilized manner

    please come back

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 27 April, 2007 23:27  

  • Understanding liberalism just read MOP and HASH to understand. A lot of cursing and then some name calling with more cursing then some hating with more cursing. That’s those great values from the 50 and 60’s. I remember Ward Clever cursing out the bev…..

    Liberalism not equal to family values.

    Liberalism equal to dysfunctional family values

    “and you will pay me reparations” Hash’s retirement plan lol

    By Blogger pf1, at 28 April, 2007 06:07  

  • Liberals should stay on their own faggy websites if they do not want to listen to Conservative ideas. That is evidence that the article is factual since there were as many liberal bs comments as conservative though the comments only came from a handful of sources. Conservatives do not sink so low as to invade liberal websites like all the Soros' funded pink lefties. Even Obama is smart enough to move to the right. It's hilarious how nuts most liberals are. I honestly believe that most liberals would vote for Hitler as long as he supported the liberal agenda and only killed off conservatives. It is a sickness these idiots got from their college professors. I think it's hilarious that over 80% of graduates consider themselves Democrats yet that number drops down to under 50% after they reach the age of thirty. It just proves that those who learn from their own lives, instead of crazy liberals teachers, move past the bias inherent in college education, developing a wisdom that leads to conservatism. liberals have gone out of their way to gain power by nearly destroying our country through their negative attitudes to our troops, attack of US foreign policies, attack of the elected president of our country, and of course the most recent attack on our economy. liberal contributors like George Soros and Warren Buffett have destabilized the US economy by short-selling the US dollar, over-buying commodities, and over-buying consolidated debt obligations then short-selling the same CDOs after creating a vast bubble which caused the current financial crisis along with Democratic protection of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The real power in the Democratic party does not care the slightest bit about our country or our people. They are willing to destroy our country to achieve their own ends, which even the most staunch liberal supporters rarely understand. Our country can not afford prolonged Democratic leadership because they are controlled by these overly-rich liberal psychos.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 13 January, 2009 19:06  

  • Lady, you are a very stupid woman, arguiing that allowing guns in schools would make them safer--crticizing media matters for printing the exact words and statements of conservatives who then criticize media matters for pointing out their lies. Why don't you move to Crawford , Texas and get drunk and wired with the worst President in the history of the Uited States. There you can set up your own little piece of shit country where everyone is forced to pary to "God"; evryone has a gun; people are executed regularly; women are forced to carry fetuses to term; corporations rule supreme over individuals; wars are viewed as an economic opportunity; and where stupidity and fascism reign supreme. I support your right to be a complete idiot--and you certainly make use of that right. You, like Hannity, Limbaugh, and all the other right-wing nut jobs have nothing to do with the real America--

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 18 February, 2009 16:41  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Page Rank Checker

Powered by Blogger