Bill O'Reilly, FOX News Channel, Janeane Garofalo
WHERE'S JANEANE?
AAR Still Evasive On Garofalo's Future
Air America Radio's inability to come clean on Janeane Garofalo's shaky future with the liberal talk radio network was the topic for your Radio Equalizer's latest O'Reilly Factor visit.
With AAR's apparent admission to FOX News that she's not likely to continue with the "Majority Report" program, confirming our previous reporting here, O'Reilly and yours truly discussed some of her most infamous recent political antics.
Special thanks to Ian at Expose The Left for capturing the video of this segment, click his link to view it.
Meanwhile, at the Majority Report's privately- run website, there's no mention of Garofalo's departure. In addition, we're hearing that anyone attempting to post questions at the site's comments section about the future of Garofalo and the show are immediately banned, with the "offending" words removed.
Your Amazon orders that begin with clicks here, regardless of what you ultimately purchase, help to support the Radio Equalizer's efforts. Thanks for your vital assistance!
Where's Garofalo? Pete at IHillary for the Radio Equalizer
AAR Still Evasive On Garofalo's Future
Air America Radio's inability to come clean on Janeane Garofalo's shaky future with the liberal talk radio network was the topic for your Radio Equalizer's latest O'Reilly Factor visit.With AAR's apparent admission to FOX News that she's not likely to continue with the "Majority Report" program, confirming our previous reporting here, O'Reilly and yours truly discussed some of her most infamous recent political antics.
Special thanks to Ian at Expose The Left for capturing the video of this segment, click his link to view it.Meanwhile, at the Majority Report's privately- run website, there's no mention of Garofalo's departure. In addition, we're hearing that anyone attempting to post questions at the site's comments section about the future of Garofalo and the show are immediately banned, with the "offending" words removed.
Your Amazon orders that begin with clicks here, regardless of what you ultimately purchase, help to support the Radio Equalizer's efforts. Thanks for your vital assistance!
Where's Garofalo? Pete at IHillary for the Radio Equalizer
published by Brian Maloney at
12:11
23 Comments:
It's truly fantasyland in AAR-ville. We're an hour in to The Al Franken Sleepytime Show and the name "Robert Novak" has yet to be uttered.
By
BF, at 12 July, 2006 12:54
You did an effective presentation on Fox though it seems to be something that should be on Inside Hollywood.
One Suggestion. You ought to set up forwarding of your radioequalizer.com domain so that it kicks over to the blogspot domain.
By
none, at 12 July, 2006 13:28
>>You ought to set up forwarding of your radioequalizer.com domain so that it kicks over to the blogspot domain.
yeah when you go to radioequalizer.com you get some material from Nov of last year.
By
raccoonradio, at 12 July, 2006 13:32
Yes, the site will be moved to radioequalizer.com very soon, it would have already happened, but I've had so many things keeping me busy. First priority was redesigning the site, next is moving it.
By
Brian Maloney, at 12 July, 2006 13:45
Yes, B.M. is a liar, blinking eyes or not. He says "In addition, we're hearing that anyone attempting to post questions at the site's comments section about the future of Garofalo and the show are immediately banned, with the "offending" words removed."
Go here and you will see lots of people asking questions:
http://www.majorityreportradio.com/weblog/archives/004338.php#comments
Nothing about banning or censorship. I think you have AAR mixed up with Sean Inanity's message board.
By
@whut, at 12 July, 2006 22:50
Good for you Brian with your FOX coverage.
My friends and yours over at the Pundit Review, WRKO, will be proud!!
To get the scoop on what happened on Beacon Hill today concerning the Constitutional Convention and the Protection of Marriage Amendment in Massachusetts please visit my blog at www.knowthyfactsnotthyneighbors.blogspot.com or by clicking on my name SCIA.
Thanks.
By
SCIA, at 12 July, 2006 23:35
Hey, guy, liberal liars do the "dodge and weave". Ever notice that? They get on these binges on TV and "bob and weave" their heads, shoulders, torso, etc. Kinda like a puppy dog shaking off water.
I don't see that with conservatives, though.
By
tradersmith, at 13 July, 2006 09:36
O'Reilly has made many on-air offers for AAR spokespersons to participate. But they refuse and continue to tremble under their desks, sucking their thumbs until the final day of reckoning, which certainly appears to be coming soon.
I can't blame AAR for not wanting to appear on O'Reilly's internationally-seen show. After all, they don't have anything worth saying; other than their ratings are in the tank, their executives are getting sacked, there is no advertising revenue, they are subsidized by some rich wacko sugar daddies, and even their supporters like the NYT have nothing positive to say.
.
Garofalo: buh-BYE
Franken: in the batter's box, next up?
By
The Benson Report, at 13 July, 2006 12:03
Just like there are terrorism experts and industry watchers, there is Brian the AAR I hope they go bankrupt watcher. Generally I prefer more impartial reporting but to work and report on Fox and to have loyal blog followings, extreme positions are required.
By
none, at 13 July, 2006 13:07
No, not dead yet.
But soon my little ones.....sooooon
By
Lokki, at 13 July, 2006 13:09
Take the liberal test! Are you a liberal?
1. Do you mis-spell easy words?
>>doesn't work their.
2. Do you swear because you're so mad you keep losing elections?
>> of course it's bad if you're fucking biased!
By
raccoonradio, at 13 July, 2006 13:33
Evidence?
Do you mean stuff like:
* their ratings are in the tank
* their executives are getting sacked
* there is no advertising revenue
* subsidized by some rich wacko sugar daddies
* their supporters like the NYT have nothing positive to say
RTFA next time.
.
By
The Benson Report, at 13 July, 2006 13:59
From Rightwingwhanker,
"I would rather watch test patterns on the T.V."
Please do!
"...obviously so would everyone else."
Obviously you are wrong again.
Here are the latest viewer numbers:
CABLE NEWS RACE - MON., JULY 10, 2006
FOXNEWS O'REILLY 2,264,000
FNC HANNITY/COLMES 1,801,000
CNN LARRY KING 1,382,000
FNC GRETA 1,340,000
FNC SHEP SMITH 1,252,000
FNC HUME 1,197,000
CNN COOPER 1,132,000
CNN DOBBS 823,000
CNN PAULA ZAHN 679,000
MSNBC HARDBALL 360,000
CNNHN GRACE 354,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 349,000 (ouch!)
.
By
The Benson Report, at 13 July, 2006 14:16
I haven't seen a ratings chart in a about 12 months but the one significant change from what I remember is Anderson Cooper.
By
none, at 13 July, 2006 14:44
"I would rather watch test patterns on the T.V."
If I had my way, you'd be seeing test patterns--color bars mainly--OR EVEN THE AMERICAN FLAG--on ABCCBSNBCMSNBCCNNPBS. And to throw it in your face--I would say that with most of prime time entertainment TV these days.
Why Old Glory, most liberals HATE AMERICA--showing the flag would be like throwing water on the wicked witch of the west from The Wizard of Oz--IT WOULD CAUSE WHAT LITTLE BRAIN MATERIAL THEY HAD INSIDE THEM TO MELT--NOT TO MENTION THEIR WHOLE BODIES!
By
The Real Bob Anthony, at 13 July, 2006 17:41
Average age of O'Reilly viewers = 71.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
By
@whut, at 13 July, 2006 19:30
"Average age of O'Reilly viewers = 71"
No, you've got that wrong.
71 is the average IQ of the liberal left.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
By
The Benson Report, at 13 July, 2006 20:53
I left a comment at their site, and it's still there. Perhaps because I phrased it in a special way:
It truly is a case of money and greed. [<---my segue]
Speaking of which, isn't everyone else sick of what the "Radio Equalizer" (aka Brian Moron-y) and the idiot at BoreAmerica [<--- that's me] are saying about Janeane? They're sick.
By
LonewackoDotCom, at 13 July, 2006 23:42
he's a designated fill in on 'RKO at this point. Who knows, could get own show if something opens up.
mis-spell; OK, maybe misspelled, but I always thought it was an acceptable
variant.
By
raccoonradio, at 14 July, 2006 12:36
>>Average age of O'Reilly viewers = 71.
Well they must all have ratings books.
His is one of the highest rated shows
nationwide.
By
raccoonradio, at 14 July, 2006 12:37
RWW said to PatWorld: " I can debate you under a table, I destroy your Rovian talking points repeatedly on this message board."
The only reason you think you can debate anyone under a table is you are much more willing to go to the invective than is your normal opponent. Or maybe you just think that your talking points are stronger than his. YMMV.
Of course, when debating people who actually use identifiable facts with links (ratings threads, Cindy Sheehan, etc.), you magically disappear from the board. I wonder why that is.
RWW: The link-free zone...
By
SierraSpartan, at 14 July, 2006 16:31
As to the blinking, it takes a long time to get used to the setup. All you're doing is staring at a blank wall in an otherwise dark room, with bright lights aimed at you.
You can't see anyone, including yourself, there are no monitors. It takes a lot of practice to get the hang of that while on national television. Try it sometime and see how you do.
If the best they can get me on is blinking, then I must be doing something right.
By
Brian Maloney, at 16 July, 2006 12:24
To Raccoonradio and Liberal Outlaw:
Regarding "mis-spelled" versus "misspelled":
Here is a reference to check:
www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/hyphens.asp
Scroll down to the second (!) Rule 1, which is under "Hyphens with prefixes".
As it states, the trend is to drop hyphens now. I remember seeing several of their examples as hyphenated in print (such as non-compliance and co-payment).
By
Chromium, at 16 May, 2008 12:28
Post a Comment
<< Home