The Radio Equalizer: Brian Maloney

12 December 2005

Monday Briefing

SPOTLIGHT: TALK RADIO

In The Middle Of Both Tookie Watch And Aussie Riots


(UPDATES BELOW)


Looking for easy scapegoats after a series of violent "white" vs. "Arab" attacks in Australia, Islamic leaders and news media outlets have been quick to fault talk radio for fanning the flames. From the London Times:


Yesterday, Islamic leaders blamed the trouble on influential talk radio hosts who had whipped up racial tensions in the wake of last weekend’s attack on the lifesavers, who epitomise Australia’s white traditions and Anglo-Saxon roots.


From The Mercury in South Africa:


The President of the Islamic Friendship Association of Australia, Keysar Trad, said the violence was "bound to happen" after callers to some talk radio shows whipped up ethnic tensions after the attacks last weekend. As evening fell on the beach the fighting subsided and Iemma appealed for calm. "I urge everyone to back our police and respect the rule of law that is the bedrock of our Australian community," he said.


While there surely must be two sides to this story, one wouldn't know it from the coverage, where photos all appear to feature drunken "whites" clashing with police.

More background from the London Times:


TENSIONS between young white gangs and youths of mainly Middle Eastern origin erupted on one of Australia’s most popular beaches yesterday in what police condemned as a racially motivated rally driven by a mob mentality.

Thousands of people, many chanting racial slurs, were engaged in running battles on Cronulla Beach in Sydney’s southern suburbs.

At least 13 people were hurt, including five police, and 12 were arrested during the clashes, which followed a week of mounting anger over an attack on two lifeguards who were beaten up by a gang of Lebanese youths.

Furious locals, many wielding empty beer bottles and waving Australian flags, shouted anti-Middle Eastern slogans as they marched across the sand, on which was written “100 per cent Aussie pride”.

One white teenager had the words “We grew up here, you flew here” painted across his back. As the crowd moved along the beach and foreshore, one man on the back of a truck shouted: “No more Lebs [Lebanese]”, a chant picked up by the group around him. Others carried Australian flags and dressed in Australian sports shirts.


While there's no way to condone such violence, it certainly would be nice to see balanced coverage that places these incidents in better context. Some perspective would be useful, rather than the usual political agendas.



Talk radio's also playing
a major role in the heated controversy over the fate of murderer Stanley "Tookie" Williams, scheduled for execution tomorrow in California, barring Arnold's personal intervention.

In a typical liberal media fashion, the Los Angeles Times has taken to slamming KFI's John and Ken for daring to balance what the paper clearly hoped would be a one-sided "debate":


Tune in to the afternoon "John and Ken Show" on talk radio's KFI-AM (640) and you get a highly personalized take on Stanley Tookie Williams and those who are lobbying for the commutation of his death sentence. NAACP President Bruce S. Gordon is "a lunatic." Los Angeles journalist/progressive political advocate Jasmyne Cannick is a "black racist" and a "crackpot activist trying to make a name for herself." Williams himself? A conman in a murderer's prison jumpsuit.

As the calendar flips quickly to Williams' scheduled execution early Tuesday morning, the former Crip has become a cause celebre for talk radio hosts John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou, who have been devoting the 5 o'clock hour of their 3-to-7 p.m. show to their "Tookie Must Die for Murdering Four Innocent People" campaign — announced with four gunshots symbolizing Williams' victims.

Williams, who has exhausted his legal appeals and has petitioned Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for clemency based on his anti-gang work from death row, would be the 12th man to be executed in California since a 1978 ballot initiative reinstated the death penalty. Compared with the earlier executions, the Williams case, with its colliding moral and social issues, has taken an unusual hold on the public's interest — and become daily grist for Kobylt and Chiampou.

Their broadcasts have drawn outrage from those who perceive whispers of racism coursing through radio dialogues that have included one of the hosts reading Williams' co-written "Gangs and Drugs" book in an affected street accent, mocking the speech of some of Williams' African American defenders.

"They're shock jocks," says Cannick, who, through the Urban Policy Roundtable, filed a complaint against the Clear Channel-owned station with the Federal Communications Commission two weeks ago over the "Tookie Must Die" hour. "What 'John and Ken' are doing is particularly egregious at this stage."

In an interview Thursday, Kobylt said the campaign seeks to expose what he and Chiampou see as falsehoods spread by Williams' supporters over the nature of the killings and what transpired during the trial.

"The pro-Tookie side had put together such a powerful mythology that we thought we had to do something that would dramatically [draw] people's attention to the truth of the case," Kobylt says. "It's not just two yahoos screaming, 'Fry him!' "

Critics say "The John and Ken Show" has added little to the public debate over the Williams case, which lies at the intriguing intersection of personal belief in the death penalty and in an individual's capacity for redemption.


For John and Ken, this kind of newspaper coverage must simply underscore their need to continue telling the other side of the liberal media's phony Tookie story.

TOOKIE UPDATE: Arnold has a backbone after all, he will not spare Tookie.

Blogs following the details: Michelle Malkin, Powerline, Ace Of Spades, California Conservative.
jacksonshh.jpg
Latest AP report here. Even the Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals couldn't find a reason to help Tookie. US Supreme Court not helping either, it's over.

NEW: Michelle Malkin reports on the media circus outside San Quentin.

NEW: KTVU-2 with execution details. CNN thinks it took too long to execute Tookie.


AUSSIE UPDATE:
Australian tensions rising, according to subsequent news reports. Aussie Tim Blair is all over this, bloggers would be well advised to link to him tonight. Blair tears CNN to shreds over the issue.

Why not get Christmas and other shopping done now and support the Radio Equalizer at the same time?

Your Amazon orders that originate with clicks here, regardless of your final selections, help to support this work. Thanks again for your vital assistance!

Have you visited the many wonderful sites listed in The Radio Equalizer's blogrolls (right-hand sidebar)?

Images: AP, Los Angeles Times

18 Comments:

  • Still waiting for you AAR data Brian, or an admission that you have none...

    By Blogger Justin, at 12 December, 2005 14:27  

  • Justin -

    I'm stunned by your unusually thoughtful and reflective comment on the article above.

    It's really a very insightful perspective on the issue.


    LOL

    By Blogger Lokki, at 12 December, 2005 16:23  

  • Yeah, Justin--about as insightful as WATCHING PAINT DRY! It's liberals like you that have allowed Tookie Williams to live for 20 years!

    Also, scums like Mumia-Abu Jamal haven been allowed to live for 25 years after he killed Philly cop Dan Faulkner!

    And let me add this--the Uber-communist 9th Circus Court of Weasels said NO CLEMENCY--talk about open and shut case!

    In terms of Australia, I can't say I blame them for going after these scumbag terrorists by any means necessary!

    By Blogger The Real Bob Anthony, at 12 December, 2005 18:16  

  • Tookie is going to die.

    Good. His group killed 5 of my friends in Los Angeles. Bastard.

    By Blogger Sailor Republica, at 12 December, 2005 18:16  

  • My comment is on a lower article, but I repeated it here so that Brian isn't let off the hook. He should back up his statements before moving on to another topic.

    Liberals have allowed Tookie Williams to live 20 years? Really, I thought he was convicted under a GOP governor (Wilson). The reality is that this is a non-partisan issue. But, so you know, I support the death penanlty for Mumia, but not for Williams. If I guy can do good deeds while still serving a life sentence for his crime, I say it's better than haqving those good deeds go undone.

    By Blogger Justin, at 12 December, 2005 19:01  

  • I think it's neat that D.T. could get a temp to take his place. It's gotta be hard to find a replacement this close to Christmas.

    By Blogger Darin, at 12 December, 2005 19:59  

  • Unhinged Malkin's response to the Australian riots is actually worse then yours.

    Her take is it's like Paris all over again.

    Hmmm. Middle Easterners riot in Paris, it's the mideasterners fault. Drunken white thugs, led by neonazi groups riot in Australia, it's the mideasterners fault.

    How can someone, like unhinged Malkin, who is mixed race, be such a racist moron?

    By Blogger Dick Tuck, at 12 December, 2005 20:16  

  • There is a certain irony here. One of the guys that harps on Maloney always harping on AAR in many, ok, most of his posts.... comes into the non AAR involved posts to harp on AAR.

    By Blogger SCSIwuzzy, at 12 December, 2005 20:42  

  • Yup, I acknowledge the irony. Nonetheless, I still think Brian should provide some facts to back up his earlier assertions (smear and run?). If he has the facts, it should only take him a minute.
    Still waiting Brian...

    By Blogger Justin, at 13 December, 2005 10:48  

  • If you no-talent ass clowns calling yourselves "progressives" (but whom can't ever show us any PROGRESS) can ask for a date for AAR's dissolution, then I absolutely MUST ask for copies of the records proving they're in the black.

    Got any handy, Justin, or are they buried under all those McFood wrappers in your parent's baseme-- er, your house?

    By Blogger Elnish Arundel, at 13 December, 2005 12:32  

  • Elnish,

    I wish I didn't have to repeat myself again, but: I DO NOT KNOW AAR'S FINANCIAL SITUATION. It may be good, it may be bad. To date, I've seen no evidence to support EITHER position.

    The only person claiming to know AAR's financial situation is Brian. Therefore, I am asking him for evidence. I cannot believe that you would think this unreasonable. To date, however, Brian has not provided any.

    By Blogger Justin, at 13 December, 2005 13:12  

  • Poor Justin has nothing better to do than to stalk Brian Maloney.

    See, it's easy for Justin to take the "show me evidence" tack on Brian. Why? Because not having evidence (which isn't surprising because they are a private company) gives Justin the "appearance" of being right. Much like not finding WMDs...liberals try to posit as fact that Saddam had no WMDs simply because we have found none. That's not necessarily true, but in the court of opinion, you win with a half-assed argument like that.

    So Justin, you can go right ahead and continue to play the role of "biased neutral observer." I have yet to see you present any evidence that you are an insider with talk radio, Justin, and thus why would you believe that AAR is flush with money? You obviously do believe it, or else you wouldn't spend so much time trolling this weblog. Of course, if they were flush, why did they try to welsh on a "loan," from the Gloria Wise Boys and Girls Club? Or better yet, why did they even accept a "loan," if they were profitable?

    Oh that's right, you don't have to prove that. Unfortunately for you, what evidence we've seen (i.e. the "loan," from the GW B+GC, missed pay cycles, etc.) suggests that their financial situation is not optimal.

    By Blogger gutshot, at 13 December, 2005 13:56  

  • Justin -

    Since you've hijacked this topic anyhow, here's some information in reponse to your query - It wasn't hard to find. Just a simple Google query.

    Air America refuses to release its fianancial data.
    Calls by reporters to the sales department are unanswered.
    They ARE selling block time on weekends to "non-agenda" programs - e.g. anyone with a nickle.
    Then, of course, there's that wonderful give-away program they have -fabulous rewards for donations to the network. That suggests they're hungry for every nickel.

    See this article from a Pittsburgh newspaper
    http://members.aol.com/cookeh/PGHTR100705.pdf

    From the ratings we've seen, there's not much of a market out there. Here in Dallas, they've actually fallen OFF the ratings charts. KXEB-am

    Since they're (promising to) pay back the Gloria Wise money ($875,000) we'll call that a draw and leave it out of the conversation

    But we SHOULD consider the missed payroll at the end of July of this year.

    All in all, I'd say that the prima facie evidence of bad financial condition puts the ball in your court, Justin, to prove that they're in good shape.

    By Blogger Lokki, at 13 December, 2005 14:05  

  • How hard is it for some of you to understand that I'm not looking to prove AAR is in good shape. I'm just asking Brian to provide evidence that AAR is in bad shape (which he regularly claims). This isn't pro-aar or con-aar, it's simply a "Explain how you reached your conclusion" sort of thing.
    Lokki-- you're right that aar is a private co. that won't release its financials, which is largely why I find brian's statements of pending insolvency to be so specious. all we know is that they've had some hits and more than a few misses. overall, howow it's time for Bever, we know nothing about its current balance sheet (which can't be devined purely from good/bad ratings, fund drives, on-air talent disputes, new/dropped affiliates, etc.).
    Again, the only point I'm trying to prove is that ANY suggestions of AAR fianancial success or failure is impossible to determine. Now it's time for brian to admit the same.

    By Blogger Justin, at 13 December, 2005 15:19  

  • Justin:

    Brian Maloney could not be the guests on all the radio and tv shows, and co-investigator reporting with Malkin, etc.... without proving to the hosts that he has the real dope on aar. Sometimes in journalism, you don't show the public what you have, cause you can't. Brian has earned the trust of MANY weblogs, TV and RADIO stations and newspapers with his AAR reporting, why? Only because he backs up what he says. Not to you Justin, but run a major media source, and if you want him to guest, maybe he'd clue you in privately.

    Geez Justin...

    By Blogger FYIFYI, at 13 December, 2005 19:13  

  • FYIFYI:
    I'm not asking Brian to reveal a source, just the info.
    As a real FYI: Latest ratings show AAR affiliates up in NYC, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Diego. Not rpoof of financial fortunes (good or bad), just facts. Come on Brian, what are you waiting for?

    By Blogger Justin, at 13 December, 2005 20:35  

  • I wouldn't get all that excited about Air America's ratings being "up" in those four cities.

    Here's the reality of the situation:

    Air America's Los Angeles affiliate, KTLK, took a baby step from 0.8 to 0.9, and is tied for 29th place.

    WLIB in New York went from 1.1 to 1.3, and is in 24th place.

    WCPT, Chicago, was at 0.8 and is now at 1.1 –- in 30th place.

    KLSD in San Diego climbed from 2.2 to 2.5 and is tied for 17th place.

    Obviously, up is better than down. But with the exception of San Diego, none of those ratings is anything to write home about. Being in 29th and 30th place in your market -- and hovering around a 1.0 share -- won't likely give advertisers an adrenaline rush.

    By Blogger The4thEstate, at 13 December, 2005 22:07  

  • Justin, don't bother with these morons. They don't seem to understand that asking for evidence of A doesn't mean you believe -A.

    I particularly like this comment from gutshot:
    I have yet to see you present any evidence that you are an insider with talk radio, Justin, and thus why would you believe that AAR is flush with money? You obviously do believe it, or else you wouldn't spend so much time trolling this weblog.

    Huh? WTF? When has Justin claimed to be a talk radio insider? And how does it follow that "trolling" this blog means Justin thinks AAR is flush with money?

    This, from fyifyi, is good too:
    Brian Maloney could not be the guests on all the radio and tv shows, and co-investigator reporting with Malkin.
    HAHAHA. Yea, right. Bill O'Reilly, Mr. Paris Business Review, has really high standards. And "investigative reporting? HAHAHA.

    I don't understand you people. It's not like we're arguing about an abstract concept. Either Maloney has the data or not. And if he doesn't show proof, what are we supposed to think? Maloney could put all of this too rest by simply prooving what he claims. Why doesn't he just do that?

    By Blogger Mr. Kite, at 13 December, 2005 23:13  

Post a Comment

<< Home



 
Page Rank Checker

Powered by Blogger