The Radio Equalizer: Brian Maloney

08 February 2007

Anna Nicole Smith Dies

WHAT IT MEANS

After Anna Nicole Smith's Death, Much To Discuss







Regardless of how you might have felt about Anna Nicole Smith, her unexpected passing today at 39 brings a number of huge issues to talk radio's table.

After all, since our celebrity- obsessed culture created Anna, did we have a role in cutting short her life? Or, did she bring these problems entirely upon herself?

How did she die? Is this new claim true? Or this? Is there a connection between this and her son's recent passing? Who will raise her infant daughter?

Could anyone have helped Smith through her nearly- constant personal crises?

Already, talk stations have broken away from regular programming in the 4pm hour to carry a live press conference, but authorities offered very little in the way of information. Reactions from those who knew her are found here.


As with any late- breaking news story of this nature, however, talk radio has been undermined by programming decisions that dump tape- delayed syndicated shows into the evening hours. That puts stations in the horrible position of running stale programs tonight that won't be talking about Anna.

Others are saddled with sports programming, which is also a bad idea tonight.

From CNN:

(CNN) -- Reality TV star and former model Anna Nicole Smith was pronounced dead Thursday after being taken to a Florida hospital, a law enforcement source told CNN.

Smith, 39, collapsed at a south Florida hotel, according to news reports.

"I can confirm that she is deceased. It's as shocking to me as to you guys," Smith's attorney, Ronald Rale, told Reuters. "I don't know anything further. [Her lawyer and husband] Howard [K. Stern], obviously, is speechless and grieving."

Smith's nurse called Seminole Hard Rock Hotel workers at 1:38 p.m. and security went to the room, hotel officials said. Fire rescue workers from both the Seminole Indian tribe and from Hollywood Fire-Rescue arrived minutes later and Smith was taken to Memorial Regional Hospital in Hollywood at 2:10 p.m.

Smith was involved in a paternity suit regarding the parentage of her daughter, Danielynn, as well as other disputes, including some regarding a house she stayed at in the Bahamas around the time she gave birth.

Earlier this week, Smith was included in a class-action lawsuit against a company, TrimSpa, for which she had worked as a spokesperson. TrimSpa makes a product it claims leads to substantial weight loss. The lawsuit alleges the marketing of the product, TrimSpa X32, was false or misleading.

Smith's son, Daniel Wayne Smith, died at age 20 just days after the birth of Smith's daughter. Pathologist Cyril Wecht said a lethal dose of methadone and antidepressants caused cardiac dysrhythmia, leading to his death.


Anna Nicole Smith wasn't a world leader, she didn't cure cancer and her overall contributions to society are questionable at best. But her life fascinated many Americans and as a result, her death is upsetting to many, no matter how one might have felt about her.


Your Amazon orders that begin with clicks here, regardless of what you ultimately purchase, greatly help to support this site's efforts. Thanks again!

Technorati tags:

Images: AP

43 Comments:

  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    By Blogger Stacy, at 08 February, 2007 19:56  

  • My first thought was - "why in hell is she getting more press upon her death than James Brown?"

    I mean, it's not the Godfather of Soul's fault that a former POTUS died on the same weekend as he...but, tell you what - drop the Anna Coverage, and go back and do the James Brown coverage that should'a happened...

    At least he was someone who contributed to this world - controversial as he was...

    By Blogger TJ, at 08 February, 2007 21:32  

  • "....her life fascinated many Americans....."

    Why?

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 08 February, 2007 21:36  

  • Same question I'm asking. Savage lambasted the media and rightfully so for their usual over-hyping of this IMHO non-story. WHO CARES about this bimbo--she had a hard partying lifestyle and it caught up to her in the end.

    Or to put it another way, she made her bed and now she's sleeping in it. And I hope this will serve as a warning to the pop tarts--you know the Bimbo Summit as the tabloids have called Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, et al.--BUT I DOUBT IT!

    The empty suits and skirts called the corporate media once again are portrayed as sharks in the water looking for blood--WELL THAT'S WHAT THEY GOT AND THEN SOME!

    Iran, North Korea, Islamofascism--THOSE SHOULD BE EMPHASIZED in the media--of corse since 90% is based in puff pieces and entertainment crap--DON'T EXPECT IT TO HAPPEN ANYTIME SOON! What happened to journalistic integrity?

    By Blogger The Real Bob Anthony, at 09 February, 2007 06:33  

  • The significance of ANS' death is that there are two guys fighting over her money via paternity claims. It is a certainty that neither will take care of the child after being awarded custody.

    The second thing of note is that the public thinks there is nothing more significant at the moment than to wallow in the minutia of a pathetic figure's death.

    How about discussing real things such as the Democrats' attempt to abuse their power with resurrection of the "Fairness Doctrine" and Pelosi's bid for a taxpayer funded mobile shakdown parlour? The second is the Democrats stealing from the taxpayer. Hash is threatening people over what he perceives as thefts from him, but that is another subject how leftists believe anything the government can take for them and doesn't is material goods stolen from them.

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 07:32  

  • Take the needle out of your arm, fudgie.

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 09 February, 2007 08:48  

  • It matters because it's a topic that interests listeners and readers.

    By Blogger Brian Maloney, at 09 February, 2007 08:53  

  • Seeing the flag-draped coffins of our lost soldiers may very well be of interest to listeners and readers as well.

    Why is that concept off-limits?

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 09 February, 2007 08:56  

  • Hash, because leftie haters like you only want to politicize that type of picture for political purposes that trivialize the deaths of those patriots.

    IE. You'd be on the same plane as Fred Phelps and his band of religious bigots and heretics.

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 09:33  

  • Has anyone been able to confirm that Anna Nicole was actually in a methadone program herself for an addiction to heroin? I remember that I read something when she had announced she was pregnant, that she was undergoing treatment for substance abuse and had used the name Vicky Hogan. When her son died it was discovered he had methadone in his blood system and I am curious if this will be the same with Anna. While everyone is already throwing stones about her life, at her as they did when she was alive, I find it amazing that they do not know some of the good that she has done. She was not only outspoken about animal rights but she actually cared about abused children and women in abusive relationships. Maybe she became famous for being infamous, however, there was more to her than reality tv ever showed, after all it is about sensationalism and she gave what she thought the public wanted. As a woman, I must say that often when we want to conceal a paternity there might be reasons involved that the "public" does not know about and who ever the father is I hope he learns to install in the little girl that her mother may have made mistakes but that she loved her and there were good things about her as well.

    By Blogger Disabled Advocate Stewart, at 09 February, 2007 10:13  

  • First
    We Vcan all agree right and left, that this is embarassing to the American media. This is not important news at all. A huge distraction issue

    second
    PCD
    Caught in an act of hackery
    " Pelosi's bid for a taxpayer funded mobile shakdown parlour?"
    ATTENTION: RIGHT WING HACKS
    NEXT TIME DO YOUR HOMEWORK
    STOP PARROTTING RNC.COM AND HANNITY
    YOU HUMILIATE YOURSELVES

    NOW LET THE DEBUNKING BEGIN




    Now watch typical right wing hackery debunked with FACTS. These pigs on the AM radio are making listeners functionally retarted........
    WARNING: FACTS AHEAD, IF YOU ARE A FUNCTIONALLY RETARTED DITTOHEAD, THIS MAY HURT YOUR BRAIN

    FACT: Pelosi’s use of a military aircraft is about security, not “personal accomodation.” It was House Sergeant at Arms Wilson Livingood who initiated inquiries into the aircraft. “I advised Speaker Pelosi that the US Air Force had made an airplane available to Speaker Hastert” following 9/11, Livingood wrote, and “I offered to call the U.S. Air Force and Department of Defense to seek clarification of the guidelines [which governed Speaker Hastert’s use of a plane].”

    In plain english, you dumb as a rock HACK, the military created the guidelines for SAFETY



    FACT: Both the Washington Post and Roll Call have reported that the plane used by Speaker Hastert was too small for Pelosi since it “needs to refuel every 2,000 miles and could not make the nonstop haul to California. ‘The Air Force determined that [Pelosi’s] safety would be best ensured by using a plane that has the fuel capacity to go coast-to-coast,’” a Pelosi spokesperson said.

    HACK: The Air force made the suggestion


    FACT: Pelosi’s office says “it is up to the Air Force to decide what type and size of plane will be required,” and that “she has never asked for a plane or space on a plane to accommodate ’supporters.’”


    ARE YOU EMBARASSED YET?

    YOU HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED, HUMILIATED AND EMBARASSED ONCE MORE PCD

    AND ANY RIGHT WING HACK RADIO HOST HAS BEEN HUMILIATED ON TIS ISSUE

    IT WAS
    DEBUNKED
    AND
    DISMISSED

    THE AIR FORCE MADE THE SUGGESTIONS
    THE AIR FORCE CREATED THE PROCEDURE FOR HOUSE SPEAKERS TO FLY SAFELY

    NOTHING TO DO WITH PULOSI

    YOU STUPID
    USELESS

    AM TALK RADIO
    DITTO HEAD

    THE RNC STARTED THIS

    THE COMPLICT MEDIA TRUMPETED IT

    IT WAS ALL LIES


    NO LIBERAL MEDIA
    IT NEVER EXISTED

    YOU HAVE A MEDIA THAT FOLLOWS EXACTLY WHAT RNC POSTS ON THEIR HOMEPAGE TO CREATE ISSUES THAT DO NOT EXIST

    IT WAS TOTALLY DEBUNKED

    NOW REPEAT AFTER ME

    NO LIBERAL MEDIA
    NO PULOSI CONTROVERSY

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 09 February, 2007 10:32  

  • Good point (and good post), DAS....

    That said, I really do believe Stern killed her. The mother and son, dying so close together, with him in proximity, and standing to inherit through custodianship of the daughter...too many coincidences.

    Also, he just seems like a sleazebag.

    Speaking of which...PCD, you can just stop with your slandering and your weakass attempts to redeem yourself as a human being....you are well known for trolling wingnut boards and blogs, and libelling and defaming just about anyone whose points you cannot refute.

    Your premise is forever, "oh, the librulls hate us", without acknowledging the facts that hatred in and of itself is not illegal, and hatred of evil can be righteous in its own right.

    Develop another angle, fudgie. This one is tired and quite boring, and may account for the fact that you are unable to repay your debt to the American people.

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 09 February, 2007 10:38  

  • This is also true, MOP...

    Pelosi would actually prefer to fly commercial...it's the authorities that don't allow this.

    Not being a right-wing conservative, Pelosi actually endeavors to follow the RULES....

    Besides, you loony-tune neocon freaks, will YOU take responsibility for the civilian passengers killed, when Pelosi is blown out of the sky a la Wellstone, Carnahan, etc.?

    Will you?

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 09 February, 2007 10:42  

  • I see I've hit a nerve with the left wing hate patrol of Hash and MoPoop.

    Pelosi wanted and demanded a 757. Pelosi was offered a Gulfstream V which has the range to go DC to Frisco. Hastert used a Gulfstream III. Those are the facts, haters.

    You boys did nothing but parrot DNC, Pelosi, and Murtha obfuscation and lies. I have an idea. How about Pelosi use Kerry's big jet he bought for campaigning. Keryy and THK can pay for it out of the inherited Heinz Billion and not touch Taxpayer money. You know haters, from each according fot their ability(or inheritances and trust funds) to each according to their need( or leftwing political desires).

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 10:49  

  • Hash,

    Do you read yourself to sleep with Sick Gary Sick's account of October Surprise?

    Hash, you are one sick person to belive that crap about Wellstone and Carnahan being killed by the GOP. Are you going to tell me the JFK, Jr.'s plane was sabotaged, too?

    What about John Heinz's plane? What about John Denver's plane? Hash, what about Knute Rockne's plane? What about Roberto Clemente's plane and why haven't we found his body?

    Hash, what about Amelia Earhart?

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 11:18  

  • PCD

    Absdolutly pathetic

    totally debunked
    the GOP is backtracking and removing themselves with the smear

    this mental patient PCD, trusts right wing radio over reality

    absolutly pathetic

    you humiliated yourself


    This crap was started on the RNC.com site, written by a college intern (probably) and parrotted in the media, it was DEBUNKED by the fricking Air Force, the GOP wants no part of the smear, and PCD is still parrotting the LIE.

    pathetic

    Being totally humiliated and dubunked this HACK goes back to campaigning against Kerry!!

    hasart flew in Air Force 1
    pulosi flies in Air force 1

    deal with it
    again your pasty faced skull and bones main stream media urinated in your face
    and you drank it, you swallowed the lies and are not man enough to admit they fooled you with LIES!!!

    sad

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 09 February, 2007 12:07  

  • Seriously sad
    Pelosi wanted and demanded a 757. Pelosi was offered a Gulfstream V which has the range to go DC to Frisco. Hastert used a Gulfstream III. Those are the facts, haters.



    The Air Force recommended this plane for her. You again were humiliated

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 09 February, 2007 12:11  

  • MoPoop,

    AF1 was not used for either Hastert or Pelosi. What the Hell are you on???

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 13:07  

  • MoPoop and Hash, even the media is telling Pelosi to shut up and take the Gulfstream V.

    http://newsbusters.org/node/10695

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 13:11  

  • The media is a bunch of complict cowards
    http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_PENTAGON_INTELLIGENCE?SITE=ILMOL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-02-09-12-44-14

    watch the "liberal" media cover this up
    http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_PENTAGON_INTELLIGENCE?SITE=ILMOL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-02-09-12-44-14

    THEY LIED
    http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_PENTAGON_INTELLIGENCE?SITE=ILMOL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-02-09-12-44-14
    http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_PENTAGON_INTELLIGENCE?SITE=ILMOL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-02-09-12-44-14

    Watch every news group in the country bury this in seconds

    not air force 1, error on my part

    FACT remains hack: the Air force recommended her to use the Jet
    get over it
    get over it
    GET THE F**K OVER IT

    http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_PENTAGON_INTELLIGENCE?SITE=ILMOL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-02-09-12-44-14

    This is the story that will be blocked by the filthy, complict right wing media, as in ABC,NBC,MSNBC,FOX, and CBS
    Cnn is covering it, it will vanish from them shortly too
    http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_PENTAGON_INTELLIGENCE?SITE=ILMOL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-02-09-12-44-14

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 09 February, 2007 13:41  

  • MoPoop,

    why are you changing the subject? Could it be you are totally wrong on Pelosi's demands and are now humiliated enough to chicken little into another story?? Typical Lib tactic.

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 13:49  

  • PCD: o.k F*ckwad, back to Pulosi
    Pulosi requested what the Air force recommended. Not hard hack

    now from the very main stream media you claim is telling Pulosi to shut up. you are wrong, you were tricked by rightwing hackery, you are not man enough to admit you are wrong. Ready for more humiliation. you sheep con lemming make me sick, sick, sociopathic

    LIARS

    MCNBC

    After September 11, Pelosi's predecessor, Dennis Hastert, was afforded the use of an Air Force passenger plane to go back and forth to his Chicago-area district. The speaker is, of course, after the vice president in the presidential line of succession.
    -- At the recommendation of House Sergeant At Arms Bill Livingood -- a former Secret Service agent who was appointed to his current job by Republicans -- Pelosi has asked the Pentagon for a plane that can carry her non-stop to her home in California. Such a plane would probably end up being larger than the one used by Hastert.
    -- The C-32, a modified 757, is one type of plane that would fit the bill.
    -- Pelosi's aide says that she has never asked for a plane or space on a plane to accommodate "supporters." The aide calls this "right wing spin."

    In a statement, Livingood said, "In December 2006, I advised Speaker Pelosi that the US Air Force had made an airplane available to Speaker Hastert for security and communications purposes following September 11, 2001. I told Speaker Pelosi that Speaker Hastert used the Air Force plane for travel to and from his district, however, I was uncertain of the rules and guidelines governing use of the plane. I offered to call the U.S. Air Force and Department of Defense to seek clarification of the guidelines."

    More: Subsequently, several members of the Speaker's staff and members of the Office of the Sergeant at Arms met with representatives from the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the U.S. Air Force liaison office to discuss the rules and guidelines which governed Speaker Hastert's use of a plane. Several questions were posed to the Air Force and we are awaiting a response."

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 09 February, 2007 14:04  

  • MoPoop can't even read his own spewings. The Air Force never offered the C-32 (757-200 for you civilians). What was offered was a C-20, which has a reange only a couple of hundred miles shorter than the C-32. Both planes fly over 4000 miles, but SF is only a little over 2000 from DC.

    The difference, the C-20 seats about 30 passengers. The C-32 can seat over 170 depending on configuration. Now which is more prestigeous to schmooze donors with?

    Also, Pelosi DID request air transport to the DNC winter meetings, a political event not in keeping with district business as is the guidelines for use of military planes by the Speaker.

    Stop your lying, MoPoop.

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 14:17  

  • MoPoop,

    To be more precise,

    Nonstop range of C-20 (Hastert’s old plane): 4,335 miles
    Nonstop range of C-32 (the plane she “needs” for nonstop flights): 4,517 miles
    Distance from San Francisco to Washington D.C.: 2,300 miles.

    Care to dispute those facts?

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 14:31  

  • PCD
    read again
    At the recommendation of House Sergeant At Arms Bill Livingood -- a former Secret Service agent who was appointed to his current job by Republicans -- Pelosi has asked the Pentagon for a plane that can carry her non-stop to her home in California. Such a plane would probably end up being larger than the one used by Hastert.
    -- The C-32, a modified 757, is one type of plane that would fit the bill.

    Pelosi asked for a plane to fit what Livingston suggested... The C-32

    PCD:
    Also, Pelosi DID request air transport to the DNC winter meetings, a political event not in keeping with district business as is the guidelines for use of military planes by the Speaker.

    SOURCE??? RNC.COM?????????????

    come on.......

    and the C-32 holds max of 32 passangers + 16 crew members, not 170 as you claim

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 09 February, 2007 15:02  

  • PCD,
    Start citing your sources please. Hearsay from Rush Limbaugh isn't good enough for educated debate.

    By Blogger Elmonica, at 09 February, 2007 15:12  

  • Elmo,

    I didn't get it from Rush or from Sesame Street. Again, refute with cites yourself or just be another liberal hypocrite.

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 15:38  

  • MoP,

    Anyone who has seen and flown on a 757 is not going to believe your 32 max passenger claim.

    MoP, repeating yourself is not a credible refutation, but a tacit admission you have nothing but DNC talking points in front of you and no other source of information.

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 15:42  

  • O.K. then Hannity, O'Reilly, Hugh Hewitt or Ingram. I certainly won't mistake you for someone who forms an opinion himself without the influence of a right-wing media hack.

    By Blogger Elmonica, at 09 February, 2007 15:48  

  • As ususal, Elmo, is a lazy, political hack.

    Try refuting this with other than a temper tantrum:

    The 89th Airlift Wing at Andrews Air Force base operates three jets that can make the nonstop flight year-round: the C-32 (Boeing 757); a C-40 (Boeing 737) and the C-20, a Gulfstream jet.

    Here's the URL: http://washtimes.com/national/20070208-121345-5680r_page2.htm

    I previously in this thread referenced Newsbusters.

    Now, Elmo, who are you parroting? Or, as usual, you are recycling Daily Kos garbage?

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 15:52  

  • hey, elmo, cite your sources. Just making a question is not refutation.

    Now, specifically refuts this:

    The 89th Airlift Wing at Andrews Air Force base operates three jets that can make the nonstop flight year-round: the C-32 (Boeing 757); a C-40 (Boeing 737) and the C-20, a Gulfstream jet.

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 16:02  

  • PCD,
    Next time, cite the permanent link to Newsbusters. Trying to wade through that garbage is bad enough.

    Also, why not make links to the information instead of being lazy and just posting the whole path?

    By Blogger Elmonica, at 09 February, 2007 16:21  

  • Elmo,

    I can't help that you are a technical retard. You've not refuted anything.

    By Blogger PCD, at 09 February, 2007 21:30  

  • Okay, now. Calmly, little right-wing fools....

    Which home district is further away from DC? San Francisco, or Illinois?

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 09 February, 2007 22:52  

  • Hash,

    What obfuscation are you trying to pull now? You can't refute Pelosi was offered a transcontental plane, the C-20. You can't refute that Pelosi wanted to wine and dine donors on th taxpayer dime. So, what are you trying to show? That you are stupid, drug addled, or just a Democrat mouthpiece too stupid to know when you lost an issue?

    By Blogger PCD, at 10 February, 2007 08:53  

  • No....just that you and many of your ilk, when given ANY opportunity to place ANY Democratic politician's life in potential danger, will do so gleefully with smears and falsehoods.

    Pelosi, in fact, wanted only to fly commercial...so much attention has been given to her travel arrangements, that any psychopath could sabotage her in order to derail our true electoral process....of course, you already understand this, but are accustomed to operating under cover of darkness.

    Guess what? Pelosi has something her crooked predecessor does not....courage, not to mention the common sense and will to actually PERFORM her job...as opposed to covering up Republican pedophiles.

    An absolute non-story, embellished to endanger yet ANOTHER Democratic trailblazer.

    We're all SO surprised you'd be a part of it, fudgie. Really.

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 10 February, 2007 09:06  

  • PCD,
    The heart of this right wing lie, is the capacity of the C-32 which is 45 passangers and 16 crew
    as per the air force website, first page that comes up in google when you search c-32

    http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=90

    SEcond, Pulosi acted on recommendation, by Livingood, former secret service.

    The C-20 was not up to spec for her flight
    the C-40 holds 120 passangers, too big for her needs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-40_Clipper)

    so the c32 was the one to go with.

    Did she pick it with her staff or did the Air Force or secret service? We do not know

    Was it picked based on the specs involved in her flight?
    YES

    did GOP.com invent a story on their website and did right wing sheep swallow it
    YES


    did PCD lie about the passanger size in a c-32
    YES

    to make his desperate [point ,he claimed 170, when the number is 45
    with a 16 crew

    the c-40 is not even as big as the make believe right wing C-32 PCD invented.

    DEBUNKED
    HUMILIATED
    and done in seconds

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 11 February, 2007 10:55  

  • PCD:


    Anyone who has seen and flown on a 757 is not going to believe your 32 max passenger claim.

    JUST TO RUB IT IN AGAIN

    http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=90

    AIRFORCE SAYS DIFFERENTLY LIAR
    HACK
    IT IS A MODIFIED 757 HACK

    http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=90


    DEAL WITH IT

    ALL YOU NEED IS GOOGLE to DESTROY RIGHT WING HACKERY

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 11 February, 2007 10:59  

  • I is so hilarious to watch MoPoop and the Hashdruggie defend feverishly defend Pelosi's attempt to abuse the privilege granded her as speaker. Just how many and who is Pelosi going to transport for what purposes? Pelosi was already denied trying to take an AF Jet to a purely partisan political function. Keep it up. YOu make yourselves political doofuses, especially Hashdruggie and his paranoid rantings.

    By Blogger PCD, at 12 February, 2007 07:49  

  • PCD

    You were proven wrong with the C-32 passanger load, no admittance of error or hackery on your half, it still is not clear whether the Jet was chosen by her or the Secret Service, so why do you continue to harp on it instead of admitting the radical GOP (who instead of creating sensible policy is busy creating stupid controversy), fed you a pile of crap and you bought it. There is no controversy, Pulosi acted on advice. The plane is not as big as you claimed it was. We are talking 170 vs 45, huge difference. You are still humiliating yourself.

    After beung 150% debunked you proceed to type
    'Pelosi was already denied trying to take an AF Jet to a purely partisan political function'

    total heresay, not a single shred of proof for this.

    let's review

    1.This attack started with the RNC talking point
    "pulosi used tax payer money for a Jet"

    2. People with 1/2 a brain responded "so did Hasart"

    3. The radical right shifted the attack into the size of the Jet and that she wanted to fly friends and campaign people around.

    4. This was than debunked after we learned former secret service advised Pulosi to use a larger Jet for non-stop flight purposes. No evidence backed the radical rights claim that she was using it for political purposes.

    5. Right wing radicals proceeded to attack the fact that the c-32 was chosen, by lying about the passanger load of the Jet

    6. This was debunked by going to the Air force website, the c-32 does not hold that many passangers


    In the end the radical right was destroyed with facts but still this deflection of attention away from the Douglas Feit evidence of false pre-war intelligence was overshadowed in the disgusting main stream media by this fake GOP.com created non-news story

    In the end GOP members and supporters once more take party over country, and shrug off pre-war LIES for a partison game.

    Revolting contermpt for the American people as usual

    By Blogger Minister of Propaganda, at 12 February, 2007 09:12  

  • MoPoop, you are Herr Goebbles successor! The point is not only the AF Plane being used by purely partisan political purposes, but the size of Pelosi's deligation! This isn't just protecting Pelosi (whose name you can't spell, moron), this is using taxpayer funds for partisan political purposes. You defend that to the extreme when it is a left winger but scream bloody murder when Bush even attends a fundraiser. You are a hyper hypocrite. Keep lying to support a corrupt Democrat regime, MoPoop.

    By Blogger PCD, at 12 February, 2007 09:24  

  • Hash, do you write as "CoolObserver" over at "Daily Krap" or do you just steal from him/her?

    By Blogger PCD, at 12 February, 2007 10:51  

  • No idea what you're babbling on about, fudgie (which is about par for the course...)

    Just know it's the usual hatred, lies and filth from your service bay.

    By Blogger hashfanatic, at 12 February, 2007 13:14  

Post a Comment

<< Home



 
Page Rank Checker

Powered by Blogger